"Eat that bug or you're not a real man!" "Oh, come on, be a man!" "Kiss her if you want her to think you're a real man!" From recess to relationships, it seems like men are constantly being questioned. You're too emotional, not a real man. Are you wearing a fedora? Definitely not a real man (personally I'm against the institution of fedoras as a whole, but that's not what this blog post is about). In Shakespeare's Macbeth, a whole new level of "be a man" is brought to the table. We've gone from "jump the farthest and you're a man" to "kill your BFF alongside several other important figures in your life and you're a man." So, what is this "manhood" about which we so wildly speculate and how is it different now than it was when Shakespeare wrote about it?
Reading Macbeth for the first time has caused me to speculate about expectations of men in today's society and how young men are raised to act, feel, speak and think. Surprisingly, I can not find many differences between expectations of men in modern situations and the expectations that Lady Macbeth and society as a whole had on Macbeth. Granted, Macbeth's situation is a tad more amplified than most modern ones, but the idea remains the same. Men are often expected to do strange, unexpected, and foolhardy things for the sake of being "manly," and often, the only argument that is required is "be a man." When trying to convince Macbeth to stop having a panic attack about Banquo's ghost, Lady Macbeth literally asks if Macbeth is a man. This stigma of being "unmanly" is not something that has not really changed. As women's rights have become prominent, the requirement for men to provide totally for a family has been eliminated, but the stereotypical man image still remains and the expectation of manly qualities such as strength and bravery exists.
Personally, I believe that there are no specific qualities that make "good men," but that there are good people. Good people are kind, honest, giving, etc. I do not think that one needs to be particularly brave or strong to be a good person. My views are vastly different from those in the play, because Shakespeare's world presented two mutually exclusive roles of "woman" and "man." For example, Lady Macbeth literally begged the spirits to make her a man so she could have power. During that time period, it was nearly impossible for women to gain any power without being married to a man with it (Lady Macbeth would have been a true fan of Beyoncé's "Run the World (Girls)"). I think that for any position of power, the candidate with the most potential to thrive in the position should be selected, however, very rarely have women been seen in real powerful positions. For example, the United States has yet to see a female president. I think Lady Macbeth had the right idea (before she convinced Macbeth to start killing people) about gender roles in society. A true example of forward thinking in history.
Would Lady M's argument (be a man!) still stand today with our ever-changing and shifting gender roles and norms?
ReplyDeleteOverall, great post!
I could totally picture you typing this hahahahaha. I completely agree with this awful modern "be a man" attitude. It seems like manliness has become synonymous for
ReplyDelete(It wouldn't let me finish stupid technology) selfishness or being an overall jerk. I think it's interesting how this has been grossly changed throughout generations. Manliness used to be measured by how much of a gentleman a man was, but now it seems the "strength" part of manliness has taken over the gentlemanliness. Men seem to need to be emotionally "strong," i.e. emotionless to be considered manly. This is completely unrealistic because everyone has emotions. I find it interesting that Lady MacBeth is telling him to man up for caring too much when nowadays most of us would kill for men to care a little(lol kill get it
ReplyDelete